Submit your data
Three photos and basic stats. Five minutes in your dashboard. Private, always.
Physique and potential analysis
Psycho reads your structure, composition, and posture through evolutionary biology, then hands you the protocol to close the gap.
Measured against the human form at its best, not against industry noise.
Every report is read and signed before it reaches you.
A full written protocol, waiting in your dashboard.
The process
Three photos in. A complete protocol out.
Three photos and basic stats. Five minutes in your dashboard. Private, always.
Around forty measurements: structure, composition, posture, symmetry. Read by instrument, reviewed by a human.
Wrists, ankles, height, and training age set your structural ceiling. The report states it in pounds, with the target band and the honest timeline to reach it.
Everything your best form requires, in priority order, in your dashboard within seven days.
Psycho for iPhone
Scores, ratios, and gait, tracked between analyses.
The evidence
Fifty years of peer-reviewed research on what appearance changes. None of it is fair. All of it is measurable.
A 10 to 15 percent earnings premium follows attractive people across careers.
Hamermesh, D. S., & Biddle, J. E. (1994). The American Economic Review.
Interviewers rate attractive applicants as more qualified for the same resume.
Puleo, R. (2006). Journal of Undergraduate Psychological Research.
Attractive servers take home $1,261 more in tips per year.
Parrett, M. (2015). Journal of Economic Psychology.
Customers are 55 percent more likely to buy from an attractive salesperson.
Reingen, P. H., & Kernan, J. B. (1993). Journal of Consumer Psychology.
On dating apps, looks carry about nine times the weight of the biography.
Witmer, J., Rosenbusch, H., & Meral, E. O. (2025). Computers in Human Behavior Reports.
In speed-dating studies, appearance consistently predicts who gets asked again.
Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; Luo, S., & Zhang, G. (2009).
People pair with partners near their own level of attractiveness. Raise the level, raise the pool.
Luo, S. (2017). Social & Personality Psychology Compass.
The same joke lands better on video than on audio alone.
Cowan, M. L., & Little, A. C. (2013). Personality and Individual Differences.
Attractive faces are perceived as healthier than they measure.
Zebrowitz, L. A., & Franklin Jr, R. G. (2014). Experimental Aging Research.
Attractive faces are assumed to be more intelligent.
Moore, F. R., Filippou, D., & Perrett, D. I. (2011). Journal of Evolutionary Psychology.
Attractive people are judged more moral and more trustworthy at first sight.
Shinners, E. (2009). UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research; Klebl et al. (2022). Journal of Nonverbal Behavior.
Doctors miss 3.67 times more diagnoses in unattractive patients.
Tsiga, E., Panagopoulou, E., & Benos, A. (2016). European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare.
What makes you better looking is, mostly, what makes you healthier.
Arnocky, S., & Davis, A. C. (2024). Frontiers in Psychology.
Attractive people live measurably longer.
Henderson, J. J. A., & Anglin, J. M. (2003). Evolution and Human Behavior.
Teachers rate attractive students more positively from the first day.
Ritts, V., Patterson, M. L., & Tubbs, M. E. (1992). Review of Educational Research; Talamas, S. N., Mavor, K. I., & Perrett, D. I. (2016). PLoS ONE.
Attractive professors earn better student evaluations.
Theyson, K. C. (2015). Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation.
The grade advantage appears in person and disappears online.
Hernández-Julián, R., & Peters, C. (2017). Journal of Human Capital; Mehic, A. (2022). Economics Letters.
Attractiveness predicts lower arrest rates.
Beaver, K. M., Boccio, C., Smith, S., & Ferguson, C. J. (2019). Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.
And lower conviction rates, in the same data.
Beaver, K. M., Boccio, C., Smith, S., & Ferguson, C. J. (2019). Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.
When convicted, attractive defendants are sentenced more leniently.
Mazzella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
Attractive people build larger, denser social networks.
O’Connor, K. M., & Gladstone, E. (2018). Social Networks.
Attractive politicians win more of them.
Jaeger et al. (2021). Social Psychology.
Promotion odds rise with rated appearance.
Morrow, P. C., McElroy, J. C., Stamper, B. G., & Wilson, M. A. (1990). Journal of Management.
Social media engagement follows the face, not just the content.
Gladstone, E. C., & O’Connor, K. (2013). Academy of Management Proceedings; Strey, S. (2019). Lund University.
Attractive people report higher well-being across income levels.
Datta Gupta, N., Etcoff, N. L., & Jaeger, M. M. (2016). Journal of Happiness Studies.
Mental health and attractiveness travel together, on average.
Farina et al. (1977). Journal of Abnormal Psychology; Borráz-León et al. (2021). Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology.
Body fat sits under almost every signal above: the waist, the posture read, the jawline. We do not analyze faces. We do not need to. Facial adiposity tracks body fat, so the leanness that narrows your waist is the same leanness that sharpens your face.
The distribution is real, Psycho exists to move you up it.
The measurement
Shoulder to waist ratio, limb lengths, insertions. The skeleton sets the rules; the analysis reads them so you stop training against your own architecture.
Where you hold fat and where you hold muscle, judged against what your frame can realistically carry.
Pelvic tilt, rounded shoulders, forward head. Most physiques lose more presence to posture than to any missing muscle.
An honest projection of your best achievable physique, drug free, and the timeline to reach it.
Inside the report
The report reads like an instrument, not an essay. Each measurement carries a current value, a ceiling, and the prescription that closes the gap.
One number, three lenses. Recalculated at every retest.
Natural ceiling 219 lb. The gap is the plan.
Target about 10. Leanness is the lens every other score is read through.
Rate bands from training age, not optimism.
Most physiques lose more presence to posture than to any missing muscle.
Costing visible abdominal definition and two inches of perceived height. Corrected before anything else is chased.
Estimated from your photos. Every gap here is trainable.
Shoulders lead. Legs lag. The program loads accordingly.
The kitchen drives this phase. Supplements, peptides, and serums enter only where they earn their place.
The science
Fitness culture argues about aesthetics as if they were invented on social media. They were not. What reads as strong, capable, and healthy was written into human perception over hundreds of thousands of years. A wide back once meant you could protect. A lean waist meant you could endure.
Psycho measures you against that standard, the one every human being is already running silently. It does not flatter. It tells you what the eye sees and what the body can become.
AXEL SIGMAR / FOUNDER
The analysis
Secure checkout via Stripe. Your photos remain private, always.
Anything beyond this list: axel@psychoaesthetics.app. A human answers.
A physique and potential analysis. You submit three photos and basic stats. You receive a written, human-reviewed report that measures your structure, composition, and posture, states your genetic ceiling, and hands you a protocol in priority order.
Anyone who trains, or intends to. Women and men both. Beginners gain a map. Experienced lifters gain honesty about their weak points.
A full written report in your dashboard: your scores, your ratios against classical ideals, your body fat classification, a posture and symmetry audit, your natural ceiling, and the training, nutrition, supplement, peptide, and serum moves that close the gap.
You can ask a chatbot for an opinion, and you will get a different one every time you ask. Psycho is an instrument: fixed standards, the same measurements for every specimen, reviewed and signed by a human who is accountable for the numbers. The value is the discipline of the method.
Within seven days of your submission. Most reports ship sooner.
One purchase, one analysis. When you have executed the protocol for twelve weeks, order a retest and the delta gets measured.
Frame and proportions, composition, posture chain, symmetry, and trajectory. Around forty measurements, each against a stated standard: shoulder to waist against the classical ideal, fat-free mass against your structural ceiling, posture against neutral.
No. We do not need to. Facial adiposity tracks body fat, so the leanness that narrows your waist is the same leanness that sharpens your face. Body fat is the biggest lever your face has.
Honest enough to act on. Structural ratios and body fat classification read reliably from three decent photos. Where precision is impossible the report gives you a band, not a fake decimal.
Instruments do the measuring. A human reads every measurement, writes the judgment, and signs the report before it ships.
Frame measurements, height, and training age set a structural ceiling. The report states yours plainly: the doctrine target, the natural ceiling, and the timeline between you and them.
Training, nutrition, supplements, peptides, and serums, in priority order. Each prescription says what to do, in what order, and why your biology agrees.
Every number in it comes from your measurements, your training age, and your ceiling. There is no template underneath.
The training assumes basic equipment. If you train at home or with constraints, say so in the notes field and the protocol is built around it.
No. The stack enters only where the evidence and your data justify it. Most protocols start with food, sleep, and steps, because that is where most of the result lives.
About five minutes. Three photos, front, side, and back, plus your age, height, weight, and training history.
Decent lighting, plain background if you can, relaxed posture, no flexing. This is a measurement, not a performance.
In your dashboard. You can watch the status move from submitted to in review to delivered.
Note them in your submission. The analyst works around them, and anything touching health gets flagged with a recommendation to see a professional.
$179.99, one time. No subscription, no upsell inside the report.
The complete assessment, the genetic ceiling, the posture and symmetry audit, and the full protocol, written, human reviewed, and delivered to your dashboard within seven days.
You will be asked to resubmit. If we still cannot produce your analysis, you get your money back.
Execute the protocol for twelve weeks, then order a new analysis. The second report measures the change against the first.
Only the analyst working on your report. They are stored privately, never shared, and never used for marketing or model training.
Photos live in private encrypted storage, reachable only through your account. Payments run through Stripe; we never see your card number.
Yes. One email and your photos and account are gone.
What reads as strong, capable, and healthy was written into human perception long before the fitness industry existed. Psycho measures you against that standard, the one every human being is already running silently.
No. It tells you what the eye sees and what the body can become. Both honestly.
Feelings lie. Structure does not. You cannot close a gap you have not measured.
No. Psycho is an aesthetic and training assessment, not a medical service. Anything touching injury or health gets flagged with a recommendation to see a professional.
Yes. Eighteen and over.
Yes. Standards, ceilings, and classifications are sex-specific. The method is the same: measure, state the ceiling, prescribe.
Email axel@psychoaesthetics.app. A human answers, usually the one who signed your report.
Reply to it. The analyst re-reviews the measurement in question and corrects the report if you are right.